Parenthood Is Not a Popularity Contest

Kids these days are really “lucky”. I see a lot of parents buzzing around their precious little ones, so too eager to please them, some even apologise to their child when their child fall and hurt themselves through their own misbehaviour. I’m not suggesting that parents should not want to bring happiness to their children. But if that is the only concern, then they are in trouble. Both the parents and the child that is.

There are two aspects I want to consider: 1) the consequence of being so preoccupied with pleasing the children and 2) the rationale behind it.  I’ll start with the rationale part.

Wanting them to be Happy

I think it is a good thing that most parents want happiness for their children.  Adult life in modern Singapore (or most places) is stressful enough, we don’t need parents to make our childhood worse off.  Anthropologist would perhaps say that this is the nurturing and social quality of humans that forms the basis for growth and development of the human species and communities.  Evolutionist would say that such qualities proved to be suitable for the survival of the human species.  I’m just glad it is so and that my parents were very loving even if my mom had to introduce me to the finer points of caning (of the palms) in my younger years as a schoolboy.

I say “most parents” grudgingly as a part of me is still reconciling with those cases where parents abuse, harm and even prove to be fatal to their children.  Unfortunately, there are such parents.  Fortunately, they belong to the fringe, the anomalies if you will.  This article is not really about them, though if they would try to behave more like they are in the parenting popularity contest, they would be better off.

Giving happiness to our children is not wrong.  Wanting happiness for them is not a crime.  Being happy when they smile and not cry is in no way something to be apologetic over.  The problem (like “buts”, there is always a problem!) is when that is all we are concerned about.  If our logic is that parents should satisfy every whims and fancy of the child in order for them to be happy, then we are so wrong.  It is one thing to be able to give our child what they want, it is another thing to simply give them everything they want.  If we do so just to achieve immediate happiness, we may end up building in them this instant-gratification mindset.  The whole society and media is already doing it, we don’t need to deepen it.

Being parents, we should have our child’s welfare and happiness in mind.  But comparing short term and long term happiness, we as adults should know better.  Behave in a myopic manner and we may regret 10 to 20 years from now, while our child have to face those consequences in his character and person for his whole life.

Parenthood is not a Popularity contest

So why do parents behave in such a way?  I observe that in the past family structure, parents in their old age may be more financially dependent on their children.  It is traditional that the parents would stay with one of the children, normally the eldest son or child.  It may vary but parents would typically stay with one of the children and be looked after in their old age.  Parents today are supposed to be more independent socially and financially but they appear to be emotionally dependent compared to parents of the earlier generation.  While I have not done any studies, I observe that many young parents these days are very concerned whether their children love or like them or not.  This to me, is one of the factor that fuels the popularity parenting mindset.  There may be other factors involved, and I hope to hear from you all
your thoughts about it.

The combination of ‘myopia’ and popularity parenting mindset creates a dangerous situation where the parents’ sole aim is to please the child, somewhats at all cost, financially and emotionally.  Without regard for the long term impact, this put the parents squarely at the mercy of the child’s emotional roller-coaster.  While the parent seem to win the love of the child, they are unwittingly teaching the child emotional-ransom.  The by-product is that some children may over the years, grow up believing that the world should and would revolve around them, just as their parents did.  By the time they reach their late teens or early twenties and step into society, they may not be emotionally resilient enough to face life’s setback.  While nobody wants such an outcome, it can become the eventual scenario if the earlier factors are not nipped off sooner.

Don’t worry if you are their favorite parent or not, just be the best parent they have!

Fortunately, I also see parents who are playing the adult role in the parent-child relationship.  Instead of being overly preoccupied with short-term happiness, they provide for their children suitably without succumbing to the temptation of “Favorite Parent Award”.  Not always giving your child what they want may mean that they will cry a little here and there, but they will also learn that they cannot cry their way to their next toy.  Oh and while you are at it, please hush your child and not let your child wail, scream and flail around in the bus or train.  Have some decency and respect for other’s peace and space.  Besides, tt is also safer for the child if you restrain him while in a moving vehicle.

On top of giving and providing for their material needs, please also give them some good values.  Grades only appear in their certificates while money is only useful when gone (spent!).  Values stay in their heart for the rest of their life.  And the best way to give them good values, is to live by those values.

I’m not anyone’s parent, but I learnt from the best parents, the best and only parents I ever had.

Worldly Tip #1: Accepting Friends on Facebook with Caution

If you are like me, you do not want to accept a friend request from “blondegal17” simply because she adds that she “find you cute and want you to check out her profile and photo gallery” which happen to be off facebook.  How do you determine if the friend request is geniune?  There are many strategies, and here are my list:

10. If it is from “blondegal17”, “Michael18” or “Asian21” who happen to also have a link to a pay-to-enter photo gallery, stay off.  Unless you are used to paying people to be your friends, I think it’s better to stay off.

9. If the requestor happen to indicate in his request that he is a banker, lawyer, tax-official, lottery-claims-agent, scientist, CEO, CFO, C-whatever-O, President, King or anyone who is helping to process unclaimed cash, and offers you a percentage for your trouble and assistance, click ignore and if you want to be a good
citizen, click “Block” and “Report”.  Again, unless you have been staying in a cave and not heard of online scams or you really have some strong altruistic wish to ‘help’ someone offload millions of dollars in return for loosing thousands, tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars, then carry on.  Or if you are one of the above mentioned person, and just wish to link up with your fellow “banker, lawyer, tax-official, etc” … … you didn’t read this article, move along.

8. If the person’s account has no common friend and no activity at all, and the profile name reads “I_LOVE_YOURNAMEHERE” (Replace ‘YOURNAMEHERE’ with your name), then you should strong avoid the [ACCEPT] button, unless you are collecting stalkers.

7. Actually, if the person has no friends at all and no activity, you may also want to resist clicking [ACCEPT].  Seriously, what is the chance that this person conveniently added you out of the millions of facebook user.  Oh, you want some stats, you little statistic-nazis?  The chance is 1 out of “more than 400 million active users” ~= 0.00000025% http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics

6. If the person just added 300 friends in the past hour … …

5. If the person just joined facebook 2 minutes and 27 seconds before adding you as a friend … … ok, you cannot really tell to that precision, but you get the drift. 😉

4. If the person’s profile photo looks like someone you know and that person already has a profile … …

3. If the person’s profile photo look like a celebrity … …

2. If the person’s profile photo returns a few hundred hits on http://www.tineye.com/ *

1. If the person’s profile photo look like me but is named something else other than “Chuan Guan Shi**” … …

 

So, how do you filter your friend request?  Share here or in facebook.  Oh and, lonelyhearts18, please don’t add me!
http://www.tineye.com/ is a website where you can search for occurrences of images on the internet.  Say, you have an invite or request from someone whose image is
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/profile-ak-snc1/profile6/68/34/n123456789_1234.jpg , you copy this url into tinyeye website and it will search and return a list if any.  I’ve spotted fake accounts this way quite effectively and these blocked accounts from sending me any more spam.  If you happen to have a popular friend who is a star, model or public figure, your mileage may vary.
** It is actually “Shi Chuan Guan” but facebook being an U.S. firm, assumes that the whole worldly round uses the First Name, Last Name / Surname convention.  In the Chinese culture, the family is more important than the individual (mostly anyway), and the naming convention of “Surname Given-Name” is suggestive of that.

Happiness Is Not What You Think It Is

Happiness is Not What You Think It is

A Dharma Talk by Venerable Kanugolle Rathanasara

24 July 2010, Saturday
7.30pm – 9.30pm

at Poh Ming Tse Temple, 438 Dunearn Road
Registration: fringe@BuddhistConference.sg

What does it truly mean to be happy, in a Buddhist sense?

Learn what happiness is, according to Buddha
in this informative discourse.
Certain misconceived notions of what happiness entails will be debunked.

Born in the south eastern Sri Lankan village of Bibile, Venerable Kanugolle Rathanasara became a novice monk in the early age of twelve and received his higher ordination (upasampada) in 1998 at the Malwatu Maha Viharaya in Kandy, Sri Lanka. His insatiable quest for learning saw him entering the portals of the University of Kelaniya, and graduating in 1998 with a Bachelor of Arts (Special) degree in Mass Communication. The noble expression of his endeavor to share his knowledge of the Dhamma internationally became fulfilled when he was selected to become a resident monk at the Sri Lankaramaya Buddhist Temple in Singapore in 2001, at the invitation of the Singapore Sinhala Buddhist Association which administers the temple.

The organisers are grateful to the Poh Ming Tse Temple for its partnership and premises for the above Dharma talk.

Visit http://www.BuddhistConference.sg for programme and speaker profile.

Group Practice in SBF

Dear Friends in the Dharma,

I’m back in Singapore and some of you have asked about the Wednesday Group Practice sessions, so here’s an update.

Venerable You Wei is serving as the new term’s Education Chairman in the SBF Board of Directors, while I have, in a way, swapped roles with him, taking on the role of Dharma Propagation Chairman from this July.  As such, I have advised Eric to consult SBF Student Society (SBFSS) on the Group Practice (English) programme and discuss with Ven. You Wei on the new directions moving forward.

For the new term, I will still be teaching in the modules for SBF Dharma classes where needed, while focusing primarily on facilitating Dharma talks and perhaps Dharma sharing sessions towards the general public.  Naturally, SBF Dharma class students would be most welcome to participate as well, so no biggie on that.

Once the programmes are finalised, SBFSS should be updating everyone on it.

Hope this clarifies.  And in the mean time, keep on meditating! 😀

With metta,

Shi ChuanGuan